Adapt the method while preserving the criterion
Course overview · 4 min reading + 12 min practice, estimated
Principles and method
An adjustment may change the format, timing, environment or tools while preserving the capability being assessed. Consider whether the assessment method is essential or merely customary. Get specialist input where a standardised instrument’s interpretation may change. Explain the process to assessors so they do not penalise the arrangement itself. Comparable assessment means a fair opportunity to demonstrate the criterion, not identical conditions in every detail. Keep the agreed rationale and evaluate whether the adapted method still yields useful evidence.
Worked example
A candidate provides a written planning response before a discussion rather than being judged on rapid unsignalled presentation. The panel still assesses planning quality and the ability to explain decisions, using the same job-related anchors.
Put it into practice
Adapt a fictional interview task in two ways and explain what remains constant.
Use fictional information and keep your work in your own notes.
Compare your approach: self-review guidance
Name the capability, the changed method and how evidence will be scored. Avoid awarding or deducting points because an adjustment was used. Seek specialist advice where measurement comparability is uncertain.
Sources and further reading
Original Academy teaching and fictional examples. These references provide context, not endorsement. Edition 2026.09; updated 2026-09-24.
- GOV.UK: Discrimination in recruitment
UK legal context. Obtain advice for your jurisdiction and circumstances.
- W3C: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
Technical accessibility background for digital recruitment services.
- CIPD: Selection methods
Professional context for selection methods and their limitations.